Tanzi v. State

The Supreme Court affirmed the postconviction court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to vacate judgments of conviction, including his conviction for first-degree murder, and his sentence of death under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851.Following a jury's unanimous recommendation for death, the trial court sentenced Appellant to death. The Supreme Court affirmed. In this successive postconviction motion, Appellant claimed that he was entitled to relief pursuant to Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). The postconviction court denied relief. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Hurst was applicable in Appellant’s case, but the Hurst error here was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. View "Tanzi v. State" on Justia Law